(CNN) -- Concorde is a thing of the past, but a number of companies are racing to release the first supersonic business jet.
Aerion Corporation is working on a jet that would reach Mach 1.6 and would possibly be ready for release by 2020, while Spike Aerospace has announced plans for the S-512,
a business jet that could travel at speeds of Mach 1.8 and would be
available by 2018. So why has it taken nearly 50 years to revisit the
concept?
According to Vik Kachoria, president and CEO of Spike Aerospace, one of the main issues that plagued the Concorde was the sonic boom -- the disruptive noise that results from the shockwaves created when an object travels faster than the speed of sound. It would rattle windows and loosen roof tiles Vik Kachoria, Spike Aerospace
"At its worst, the sonic
boom would sound like a loud thunder clap over your head. It would
rattle windows and loosen roof tiles. It was pretty jarring. If you
lived under the Concorde's flight path, you might hear it several times a
day," he says.
The effect was so
disturbing that most countries either banned supersonic flights, or
restricted them from traveling over land. Understandably, this is an
issue that the aerospace industry has needed to address in order to make
supersonic flight viable.
A plane without windows?
Kachoria notes that
currently, it makes more sense to develop supersonic business jets than
larger commercial aircraft, because the plane's diminutive size results
in a smaller boom.
While he's remained
tight-lipped about many aspects of the design (some are still awaiting
patent), he recently announced that the S-512 will be built without
windows (except for the one the pilots see out of), a feature that will
reduce drag and overall cost of the unit.
"Even at subsonic speeds,
windows add a tremendous cost to the aircraft because the fuselage has
to be designed to support those windows. If you eliminate all that, you
create piece with less structural issues, less manufacturing costs, and
less parts count," he says.
It sounds like a
claustrophobe's nightmare, though Kachoria has attempted to compensate
for the windowless design by installing flatscreens, which can either
display the view outside, or can be used to show a movie or PowerPoint
presentation -- should a conference need to take place in the air.
"It's not a new concept,
but in the past we didn't have the technology -- the flatscreens, or
digital cameras to capture the resolution, or the ability to stitch
together cameras to create a seamless panoramic view," he says.
Overall, the saving in manufacturing means each unit will cost between $60 million to $80 million.
It's all in the wing
According to Aerion, the
main detriment to producing a supersonic aircraft in the near future
isn't the boom (an issue even Kachoria admits is still another 15 years
or so from being fully resolved), but the cost.
"The reasons speeds
haven't changed much since the 1960s has more to do with economics than
technology. You just can't have supersonic travel at the rock-bottom
fares most passengers prefer" says Jeff Miller, the director of
communications for Aerion.
"Those constraints don't
apply to business jets, so it's most likely supersonic technology will
be applied there first. Even so, economy of operation is important,
mainly in terms of fuel efficiency. If you can't find a way to reduce
fuel consumption, you won't have a supersonic jet that will get you very
far," he adds.
When the Concorde slowed
down to below Mach 1, it burned though more fuel. Aerion has been
researching ways to compensate this with the development of the supersonic natural laminar flow (SNLF) wing, which it has been testing in conjunction with NASA.
The wing, which is
thinner and shorter than typical plane wings, has been proven to reduce
friction drag by 80%, and overall airframe drag by 20%.
"The more drag, the more power required to push a wing through the air," explains Miller.
A resolution?
While work is being done
on the sonic boom issue, neither Aerion nor Spike expect to release a
jet before it's resolved completely. The early models will likely only
be able to reach high speeds when traveling over seas.
"We don't have the sonic
boom issue resolved yet," admits Kachoria, "you wouldn't be able to fly
above Mach 1 between New York and Los Angeles, for instance. But
between Tokyo and LA? You'd see a big time savings."


Post a Comment